Comments on: New York Times Names Michael Arrington ‘Ethics Czar’

By: dantynan

dantynan — Fri, 27 Nov 2009 17:35:50 +0000

JC's endorsement not withstanding, it was Arrington who brought the church into this story. Here's the lead graph of his rant against the NY Times:

"Two things that would end hypocrisy and make the world a better place: Priests should be allowed to get married, and the New York Times should update its Ethics Policy."

How could we possibly ignore that?

yrs in christ,

dt

By: JR Raphael

JR Raphael — Fri, 27 Nov 2009 16:46:56 +0000

Mike:

It's okay. We've been endorsed by Jesus. (http://www.esarcasm.com/3874/jesus-christ-to-en...)

By: Mike Santiago

Mike Santiago — Fri, 27 Nov 2009 00:36:54 +0000

Including the Catholic Church in this story is cheap humor.

By: John E. Bredehoft (Empoprises)

John E. Bredehoft (Empoprises) — Tue, 08 Sep 2009 16:42:45 +0000

So when will the Times release its new policy for embargoed information? Actually, considering the Pentagon Papers case, the Times probably doesn't need to change its policy.

By: The Coop

The Coop — Tue, 08 Sep 2009 01:14:43 +0000

This may be the best thing I've ever read.